Hey everyone, hope you all have had a pleasant week. Thought I would post this video as a way to further our reflection on ethnographic methodology and the various mediums through which such methodology is predicated - in this instance particularly, the use of language and the way in which it may complicate/mystify/distort what is represented. How does ethnography move pass the possibility of language and linguistic/semantic/grammatical representation to be inarticulate?
"What can be said can be said clearly, what cannot be said clearly is not in the world, and one must be silent about it." Very interesting quote. Places a very high importance on the precision of language that correlates with the idea that there must be a precision in documentation during ethnography. Still in many cases paraphrasing and twisting the meaning of words occurs, even in Anthropology. And I definitely see what you mean by the use of language, the speaker makes the idea of "the sense of god" and his inhabiting a place seem so bizarre simply through the questions he poses to the audience and his tone inflections.
"What can be said can be said clearly, what cannot be said clearly is not in the world, and one must be silent about it." Very interesting quote. Places a very high importance on the precision of language that correlates with the idea that there must be a precision in documentation during ethnography. Still in many cases paraphrasing and twisting the meaning of words occurs, even in Anthropology. And I definitely see what you mean by the use of language, the speaker makes the idea of "the sense of god" and his inhabiting a place seem so bizarre simply through the questions he poses to the audience and his tone inflections.
ReplyDelete